On Future War

How Power, Technology, and Ideas Transform War and Warfare

War’s nature may be enduring, its character is prone to change. Today’s global conflict landscape ranges from conventional interstate wars to low-level, persistent violence, and myriad forms in between. In the HCSS programme On Future War, we examine why and how states and groups use violence and coercion to achieve political goals—across land, sea, air, space, and cyberspace.

We study the causes of war, and consider how actors plan, prepare, equip, and fight at the strategic, operational and tactical levels of war. We analyse the role of social structures, technology and ideas. Beyond the battlefield, we look at how politics shape the logic of war and peace and the decisions of civil and military leaders. We also study war’s destructive and transformational effects on societies, and how wars start and end, in order to prevent their outbreak, contain their spread, and facilitate their termination.

By bridging traditional and future perspectives, we seek to understand war’s connected, kinetic, and synthetic dimensions.

Trending

HCSS On Future War Programme

  • Blinded By Bias: Western Policymakers and Their Perceptions of Russia before 24 February 2022

    Why did so many Western governments fail to anticipate Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, despite all the warning signs? Based on 44 interviews and in-depth analysis, this groundbreaking new HCSS report by Tim Sweijs, Thijs van Aken, Julie Ebrard, Philippe van Pappelendam and Anna Hoefnagels reveals how psychological and cognitive biases distorted policymakers’ threat perception — with far-reaching consequences.

    Read more
  • Deterrence Warning Messages: A Short Guide for NATO

    Why do deterrence efforts fail? Often, it’s not what is said, but how it’s said. In a new report, HCSS strategic advisor Dr. Jeffrey H. Michaels explores how the success or failure of deterrence often hinges not just on military threats, but on how warnings are communicated. With case studies from WWI to Ukraine, this report offers practical lessons for NATO’s current and future deterrence strategies.

    Read more
  • Boeklancering | De oorlog van morgen: Wat de conflicten van nu ons leren over toekomstige dreigingen

    Op 24 april verschijnt "De oorlog van morgen" (Uitgeverij Balans), waarin experts Martijn Kitzen en Tim Sweijs analyseren hoe moderne oorlogvoering razendsnel verandert door nieuwe wapens, technologieën en strategieën, van AI tot drones en van sabotage tot desinformatie. “De oorlog van morgen” biedt een scherpe blik op de dreigingen van vandaag én morgen, en wat dat betekent voor Nederland. Hoe bereiden we ons voor? Een onmisbare gids voor beleidsmakers, militairen en burgers die onze veiligheid willen begrijpen en beschermen.

    Read more
  • Anticipating Regret: The Psychology of Deterrence, in Ukraine and beyond

    Why did Western Allies fail to deter Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and how can our deterrence improve? In this guest paper, Kenneth Payne, Professor of Strategy at King’s College London, explores how regret and shifting preferences shaped Western responses. Payne argues for a dynamic, self-reflective approach to deterrence that accounts for evolving goals and biases, complementing the focus on adversaries. Policymakers must challenge assumptions, revisit judgments, and embrace imagination to better navigate future crises.

    Read more
  • From the Steppes of Ukraine to the Shores of Formosa: Lessons Learned from Contemporary War for Taiwan

    What lessons can Taiwan learn from the Russian war in Ukraine? A new HCSS study by Davis Ellison, Benedetta Girardi and Tim Sweijs analyses Ukraine’s resistance against Russia, offering key insights for Taiwan’s defence strategy. The report highlights the importance of asymmetric denial tactics, sustained resilience, and strategic deterrence to counter a potential Chinese invasion. Key recommendations include strengthening air and missile defence, enhancing naval strike capabilities, and improving intelligence networks. By learning from Ukraine, Taiwan can bolster its defences and deter aggression.

    Read more
  • Lessons Learned from the War in Ukraine Applicable to Taiwan: The Land Domain

    The war in Ukraine illustrates the use of various old and new techniques in warfighting, employing both Western cutting-edge and Soviet-era equipment. Different innovations and adaptations have been witnessed across domains. Although each war is unique, we can distil lessons about the ongoing trends in warfighting and the employment of new and old equipment. This guest paper by Dr Viktoriya Fedorchak explores the lessons that can be learned from the land domain, focusing on the relevance for the potential Taiwan–China conflict.

    Read more
  • Lessons for Taiwan from the Russo-Ukrainian War

    Taiwan has faced threats from China for decades, but the risk of invasion has grown significantly since Xi Jinping’s rise to power. Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine has reshaped global geopolitics, offering valuable lessons for Taiwan’s national security. These lessons, however, must be adapted to Taiwan’s unique conditions, writes guest author Dr. Jyh-Shyang Sheu, Institute for National Defence and Security Research, in this HCSS paper. 

    Read more
  • The Maritime War in Ukraine: The Limits of Russian Sea Control?

    At the onset of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov were under firm Russian control. This narrative, however, quickly shifted, raising critical questions: How did Russia lose its maritime edge against a country with virtually no navy? How did Ukraine achieve such significant naval successes? This paper by guest author Prof. Alessio Patalano of King’s College London explores these questions and reveals how Ukraine turned the tide in the naval dimension of the conflict.

    Read more
  • Lessons Learned from the War in Ukraine applicable to Taiwan: Airpower

    The war in Ukraine has underlined the importance of airpower in a contemporary conflict like never before. What lessons from that conflict can be learned and applied to a possible future conflict in and around the island of Taiwan? This paper by HCSS strategic advisor Peter Wijninga will focus on the lessons for airpower, be it crewed or uncrewed, and ground-based air defence.

    Read more
  • Book launch | Defence Planning for Small and Middle Powers: Rethinking Force Development in an Age of Disruption

    Edited by Tim Sweijs, Saskia van Genugten, Frans Osinga, this new book published by Routledge examines the processes, practices and principles of defence planning in small and middle powers.

    Pre-Order link

    Small and middle powers are recalibrating their force postures in this age of disruption. They are adapting…

    Read more
  • Tim Sweijs and Jeffrey H. Michaels | Beyond Ukraine: Debating the Future of War

    War in the 21st century will remain a chameleon that takes on different forms and guises. This book, edited by Tim Sweijs and Jeffrey H. Michaels, offers the first comprehensive update and revision of ideas about the future of war since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. World-renowned international experts from the War Studies field consider the impact of the war in Ukraine on the broader social phenomenon of war: they analyse visions of future war; examine the impact of technological innovation on its conduct; assess our ability to anticipate its future; and consider lessons learned for leaders, soldiers, strategists, scholars and concerned citizens.

    Read more
  • Empty Promises? A year inside the world of Multi-Domain Operations

    The multi-domain operations concept is now guiding the transformation and modernization of Western armed forces and of their peers. Yet, there are real concerns about MDO will mature into a fully functional warfighting concept or whether it will go by the wayside like effect-based operations in the past. For nearly a year, HCSS strategic analysts Tim Sweijs and Davis Ellison visited some of the main centers for thinking on multi-domain operations, to appraise the state of multi-domain operations development with a primary question in mind: Will it actually help to win wars? If so, how?

    Read more
  • HCSS-NATO HQ SACT Symposium Report | Rethinking Fire and Manoeuvre across the physical and non-physical aspects of domains

    On 27 September 2023, HCSS, in partnership with NATO Headquarters Supreme Allied Command Transformation (HQ SACT), held a day-long symposium in The Hague to discuss the topic “Rethinking Fire and Manoeuvre across physical and non-physical aspects of domains.” This conference report by Davis Ellison and Tim Sweijs offers a consolidated review of the discussions held during the seminar.

    Read more
  • Breaking Patterns: Multi-Domain Operations and Contemporary Warfare

    Today the dominant concept within NATO and other technologically advanced militaries is multi-domain operations (MDO). MDO aim to combine and coordinate effects from across military and sometimes non-military actions. This new HCSS study by Davis Ellison and Tim Sweijs examines how the adoption of MDO concepts can help armed forces achieve military success. The report argues that MDO could break away from the worst patterns of past conceptual work, though this will require concerted changes in prevailing approaches.

    Read more
  • How Wars End | War terminations: insights for the Russia-Ukraine War

    How do wars end? Tim Sweijs and Mattia Bertolini consider what we can learn from past war terminations: how long they last, how they end and factors that contribute, if they relapse and what this means for the Russia-Ukraine war.

    Read more
  • The Conduct of War in the 21st Century: Kinetic, Connected and Synthetic

    This book examines the key dimensions of 21st century war, and shows that orthodox thinking about war, particularly what it is and how it is fought, needs to be updated.

    Accelerating societal, economic, political and technological change affects how we prepare, equip and organise for war, as well as how we conduct war…

    Read more

War and Statecraft in a Changing International Order 

Wars are and have always been a product of the age in which they are waged. We consider wars, actual and potential, within their wider geopolitical, social, and technological contexts. Amidst global and regional power transitions, power vacuums and deterrence gaps emerge around the world. Alliance and alignments configurations shift and adapt to ongoing changes in the international hierarchy. Against this background, coercive statecraft, including the recourse to violence, has become much more salient in recent years in the process opening up windows for war across different theatres. From the steppes of Ukraine to the shores of Taiwan and beyond, we analyse the strategic dynamics of war and peace time situations and consider sources of instability. We examine the perceptions and psychology of political leaders, decipher diverging grammars of coercion, capture patterns of escalation and de-escalation, and identify insights for political and military decision makers and the societies they serve.

Strategic Competition, Technology and Industry

Increased interstate competition fuels technological innovation which alters military balances of power and affects the character of war. Our research highlights how technological innovation—from military AI and unmanned systems to cloud-enabled C4ISR and space infrastructure— reshapes international relations and changes warfare. We assess how emerging technologies influence deterrence and strategic stability, while challenging assumptions about their universal applicability. We explore how adaptation and innovation arises within but also beyond current security and defence ecosystems. We consider the societal, industrial and scientific factors and actors that bolster European and national defence technological and industrial bases, and critically review the prerequisites for strategic autonomy. We identify capability gaps and opportunities for European and NATO defence planning processes to support modernisation and interoperability and create operational and strategic advantage.

Defence Planning, Military Adaptation and Transformation

War represents a continuous competition in adaptation between armed forces and the societies that sustain their war efforts. Fundamental changes in its conduct occur when military organisations develop and adopt operational concepts and structures that most effectively exploit the systems at their disposal. Our research examines emerging ideas in military operational thinking across multiple warfighting domains, encompassing strategic concepts, doctrines, and tactics employed by state and non-state actors alike. Drawing on extensive field research, we analyse how these actors adapt to secure advantage on the battlefield. Through detailed campaign and war analyses, we extract lessons learned, assess the internal coherence and external validity of contemporary warfighting concepts, and evaluate their relationship to organisational transformation. Beyond the battlefield, we extend our analysis to defence planning, comparing and assessing methodologies, techniques, and capability procurement processes that underpin the development and sustainment of armed forces.

Adapting to Complex Threats: Denial & Resilience

Sub-threshold activities exploit the grey zone below armed conflict, using cyberattacks, disinformation, economic coercion, and covert operations to weaken opponents. We develop frameworks to counter such activities, to strengthen security and resilience offering practical policy measures to protect critical interests. Our work emphasies that effective denial and resilience require more than technology; they depend on societal awareness and political will coupled with strategic agency.

Related News

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930

Our Activities and Our Team 

  • Our experts publish books, articles and reports on the changing character of war and implications for international security and security and defence planning.
  • We commission contributions from scholars, and convene international and national symposia with key experts from across the globe.
  • We regularly share our views on war’s past, present and future in political and public fora, through expert testimony in parliamentary committees, participation in Track 2.0 and 1.5 Dialogues, and in contributions to national and international media outlets.
  • We conduct field research in contemporary conflict theatres and headquarters, and execute strategic surveys, trend and scenario analyses and horizon scanning exercises.
  • We make use of predictive and explorative modelling tools and techniques based on our extensive HSSS Research Methods and DataLab portfolio.
  • We also rely on traditional approaches leveraging the knowledge and insights of our experts.
  • We offer operational evaluations  and lessons learned studies, alongside red teaming and war and crisis exercises with our Strategic Capability Gaming Serious Gaming services.

Our team consists of experts and professional with experience at all levels of the military and in conflict zones around the world.

All Research On Future War

Catch up on all of HCSS’s work on war and warfare in today’s world.

© The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies