HCSS
  • News
    • BNR | De Strateeg
    • Columns
    • Draghi Report Series
    • Events
    • Podcasts
  • Publications
    • Publications
      • All Publications
    • Defence & Security
      • Behavioural Influencing in the Military Domain
      • (Nuclear) Deterrence and Arms Control
      • Hybrid Threats
      • Rethinking Fire and Manoeuvre
      • Robotic and Autonomous Systems
      • Strategic Monitor Dutch Police
      • Transnational Organised Crime
    • Geopolitics & Geo-economics
      • China in a Changing World Order
      • Europe in a Changing World Order
      • Europe in the Indo-Pacific
      • Knowledge base on Russia (RuBase)
      • PROGRESS / Strategic Monitor
      • Transatlantic Relations
    • Climate, Energy, Materials & Food
      • Climate and Security
        • International Military Council on Climate and Security (IMCCS)
        • Water, Peace & Security (WPS)
      • Critical Minerals
      • Energy Security
        • Tank Storage in Transition
      • Food Security
    • Strategic Technologies
      • Cyber Policy & Resilience
        • Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace (GCSC)
      • Emerging Technologies
      • Global Commission on Responsible Artificial Intelligence in the Military Domain (GC REAIM)
      • Semiconductors
      • Space
  • Dashboards
    • Dashboards
      • All Dashboards
        • GINA
    • Defence & Security
      • DAMON | Disturbances and Aggression Monitor
      • GINA | Military
      • Nuclear Timeline
    • Geopolitics & Geo-economics
      • Dutch Foreign Relations Index
      • GINA | Diplomatic
      • GINA | Economic
      • GINA | Information
    • Climate, Energy, Materials & Food
      • Agrifood Monitor
      • CRM Dashboard
    • Strategic Technologies
      • Cyber Arms Watch
      • Cyber Comparator
      • Cyber Norms Observatory
      • Cyber Transparency
  • Services
    • HCSS Boardroom
    • HCSS Datalab
    • HCSS Socio-Political Instability Survey
    • Strategic Capability Gaming
    • Studio HCSS
    • Indo-Dutch Cyber Security School 2024
    • Southern Africa-Netherlands Cyber Security School 2025
  • NATO Summit
  • GC REAIM
    • GC REAIM | Members
    • GC REAIM | Conferences
    • GC REAIM | Partners, Sponsors, Supporters
  • About HCSS
    • Contact Us
    • Our People
    • Funding & Transparency
    • Partners & Clients
    • HCSS Newsletter
    • HCSS Internship Programme
    • Press & Media Inquiries
    • Working at HCSS
    • Global Futures Foundation
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

News

The Strategic Contractor

September 19, 2007

Outsourcing laundry services is fine, but what happens when private contractors need to use deadly force to protect their clients? Would you let a temp agency take decisions in your company that may have a long-term impact? The recent announcement by the Iraqi government to revoke the license of Blackwater USA in the wake of an incident that cost the lives of eight Iraqi civilians demonstrates the strategic impact civilian contractors are having on contemporary military operations.

With the rise of Blackwater to become officially part of the ‘total force’ concept, the US government has effectively outsourced part of its core-business. In total an estimated 100,000 contractors are active across the entire spectrum of the military deployment in Iraq. What remains unclear is where to stop using contractors between the “tail” and the “tooth” of the military deployment.

Last Sunday’s shootings in Baghdad are a terrible tragedy but also illustrate a more general perception among many: the downside of contractors on the frontline. Since the 1990’s the rise of private military companies has been closely related to the ‘transformation’ of the US military. The Clinton administration significantly downsized the number of military personnel, many of whom then found their way into the private sector. During Rumsfeld’s tenure a shift towards a lighter, leaner, more mobile force implied a further specialization towards high-intensity operations. The underlying business logic is simple: outsourcing to improve the flexibility of the defense organization.

From laundry services and catering to logistical support in the form of fuel transports or strategic airlift civilian contractors have long kept Western militaries up and running when deployed in the field. Prior to 9/11 this was coupled to the strategic argument that the US military should focus on major regional conflict. Then Afghanistan and Iraq happened. The US military became involved in the largest nation-building exercise in its history although it had neither the sufficient manpower nor the appropriate skill-sets in its ranks. With only 150,000 forces in a country the size of France the Pentagon outsourced many of the military tasks not directly related to ‘getting the bad guys’. Civilian contractors were necessary to construct schools, hospitals, bridges, roads, pipelines, factories. And to protect them as well.
The problem has become salient by a failed understanding of what it takes to achieve success in a counterinsurgency or stabilization campaign. ‘Winning the peace’ sometimes requires compromising on force protection. By contrast, the image of paid mercenaries protecting Americans at the expense of Iraqi lives does not win hearts and minds. Especially when contracts are based on the principle of ‘ends justifying the means’. Deadly force becomes an option, and civilian deaths among the Iraqi population now have made their government turn against the US mercenary regime.
Still, civilian contractors are here to stay, unless the US significantly increases its military. That is not all bad. They serve much-needed purposes, and last Sunday’s killings should be seen as exceptions rather than the rule. However policymakers need to understand the strategic impact private contractors can have. Incidents involving contractors are easily magnified and can compromise the success of the entire mission. We have in fact entered an era of the strategic contractor.

Current circumstances in Iraq make it painstakingly clear that civilian contractors at times operate without clear oversight and jurisdiction. Blackwater and others have in the past been involved in combat operations that go beyond the classic mandate of civilian contracting. The question must be answered to what extent this still serves the logic of outsourcing, and at what point the activities of such companies become a danger instead of an asset. Oversight is key to this. Western governments need to develop a system based on unity of command and jurisdiction when deploying contractors in conflict zones. Not only the strategic imperative is at stake, but also the innocent loss of life.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

Experts

Related News

Related Content

Closing_the_Loop_Towards_Strategic_Defen
Strategische Monitor 2021
Guidelines for the Deterrence of Hybrid Threats (HCSS 2023)

Office Address

  • The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies
  • Lange Voorhout 1
  • 2514 EA The Hague
  • The Netherlands

Contact Us

  • Telephone: +31(70) 318 48 40
  • E-mail: info@hcss.nl
  • IBAN NL10INGB0666328730
  • BIC INGBNL2A
  • VAT NL.8101.32.436.B01
  • Contact

Legal & Privacy

  • Disclaimer & Privacy
  • Algemene Voorwaarden (NL) 
  • Terms & Conditions (ENG) 
  • Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure
  • Ethical Standards
  • Manual for Responsible Use of AI

Follow us

© The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies
    Link to: Schaarste is een grotere dreiging dan Bin Laden (NL) Link to: Schaarste is een grotere dreiging dan Bin Laden (NL) Schaarste is een grotere dreiging dan Bin Laden (NL)
    Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

    GDPR Consent

    Your privacy is important to us. Here you can set which consent you are allowing us with regards to the collection of general information, the placing of cookies of the collection of personal information. You can click 'Forget my settings' at the bottom of this form to revoke all given consents.

    Privacy policy | Close
    Settings

    GDPR Consent Settings

    Your privacy is important to us. Here you can set which consent you are allowing us with regards to the collection of general information, the placing of cookies of the collection of personal information. You can click 'Forget my settings' at the bottom of this form to revoke all given consents.

    Website statistics collect anonymized information about how the site is used. This information is used to optimize the website and to ensure an optimal user experience.

    View details

    Functional cookies are used to ensure the website works properly and are neccessary to make the site function. These cookies do not collect any personal data.  

    View details
    Forget my settings Deleted!