HCSS
  • Home
  • Research
    • Research
      • All Publications
    • Trending Topics
      • Europe in the Indo-Pacific Hub
      • Climate & Security
      • Energy & Natural Resources
      • Cyber Policy and Resilience
      • Initiative on the Future of Transatlantic Relations
      • PROGRESS / Strategic Monitor
    • All Topics
      • Defense & International Security
      • Global Power Shifts
      • National Security Strategy
      • Energy
      • Environment & Climate
    • All Topics
      • Knowledge base on Russia: RuBase
      • Governance & International Organization
      • Technology & Innovation
      • Sustainability & Resource Scarcity
    • All Topics
      • Minerals & Metals
      • Emerging Economies
      • Terrorism Piracy & Crime
      • Food
      • Water & Land
  • News
    • Podcasts
    • Columns
    • Events
  • Services
    • The HCSS Datalab
      • Climate Security Risk Monitor
      • Cyber Arms Watch
    • Strategic Capability Gaming
    • Studio HCSS
    • Strategic Analysis
    • Summer Schools
    • IDCSS 2021
      • About
      • Cyber Resilience Game
      • 2021 Challenges
      • Program 2021
      • Organizers
      • FAQ
      • Apply
  • About Us
    • Experts
    • Contact
    • Press & Media Inquiries
    • Jobs
    • Partners & Clients
    • IMCCS
    • Global Futures Foundation
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

News

Washington Post: A $450 Billion Opportunity to Loosen Putin’s Energy Grip

June 9, 2022

The Groningen gas field in the Netherlands is vast. It’s the largest in the European Union, and one of the 10 biggest in the world. Its available reserves of about 450 billion cubic meters are equivalent to all the EU’s needs for one year. It’s exactly the kind of precious (if non-renewable) economic resource that would normally be front and center in an energy crisis like the one afflicting the region today.

But that’s not what’s happening. Groningen production is actually being wound down with a view to halting it next year, part of a long-standing pledge to address earthquake risks and environmental damage. It’s one of several European energy paradoxes that deserve to be reconsidered in the wake of Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.

Without the pressures of war, the shuttering of Groningen might look justified. It was tapped for decades with little care for locals, whose complaints over tremors were ignored for a long time. The cost of continued production became linked to billions of euros in compensation claims and housing repairs. Groningen lost its “social license to operate,” a paper by the Hague Centre for Strategic Studies (HCSS) concluded in 2019.

Yet today it also seems irresponsible to ignore the unintended consequences of a phaseout process that began in 2014 and effectively became final in 2018. Replacing 54 billion cubic meters of gas annually (in 2013 terms) meant increasing dependence on Russia. And now that dependence has to be unpicked at high speed and cost, straining European unity, morale and finances.

If war can’t entirely change the politics of pumping more fossil fuels in an earthquake-prone region, there should at least be more recognition of the need to plan for the future and to help Europe as a whole. HCSS analyst Jilles van den Beukel suggests tapping Groningen specifically to hit EU-wide targets of 80% of storage capacity due for November. The more gas is stored, the less dependence there is on imported supplies.

There is obviously no easy fix: Nobody with a blank canvas today would willingly choose to intensify fossil-fuel production. Yet the Groningen debate is one of several signs that suggest a disconnect between ambition and reality.

Read the full analysis by Lionel Laurent in The Washington Post, or on the Bloomberg website.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

Experts

Jilles van den BeukelJilles van den Beukel
Lucia van Geuns

Related News

Related Content

  1. Lucia van Geuns in The Washington Post: Effects of EU Russia oil ban, Moscow’s response
  2. HCSS paper series | The Future of the European Tank Storage Sector
  3. Groningen License Operate Groningen gas: the loss of a social license to operate

Office Address

  • The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies
  • Lange Voorhout 1
  • 2514 EA The Hague
  • The Netherlands

Contact Us

  • Telephone: +31(70) 318 48 40
  • E-mail: info@hcss.nl
  • IBAN NL10INGB0666328730
  • BIC INGBNL2A
  • VAT NL.8101.32.436.B01
  • Contact

Legal & Privacy

  • Disclaimer & Privacy
  • Terms & Conditions (NL) 
  • Terms & Conditions (ENG) 
  • Responsible Disclosure Policy

Follow us

© The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies
    Online Seminar | Cyber Offence Uncovered: Introducing the Cyber Arms WatchJack Thompson to speak at the JASON Institute | U.S. Grand Strategy: looking...
    Scroll to top

    GDPR Consent

    Your privacy is important to us. Here you can set which consent you are allowing us with regards to the collection of general information, the placing of cookies of the collection of personal information. You can click 'Forget my settings' at the bottom of this form to revoke all given consents.

    Privacy policy | Close
    Settings

    GDPR Consent Settings

    Your privacy is important to us. Here you can set which consent you are allowing us with regards to the collection of general information, the placing of cookies of the collection of personal information. You can click 'Forget my settings' at the bottom of this form to revoke all given consents.

    Website statistics collect anonymized information about how the site is used. This information is used to optimize the website and to ensure an optimal user experience.

    View details

    Functional cookies are used to ensure the website works properly and are neccessary to make the site function. These cookies do not collect any personal data.  

    View details
    Forget my settings Deleted!