HCSS
  • News
    • BNR | De Strateeg
    • Columns
    • Draghi Report Series
    • Events
    • Podcasts
  • Publications
    • Publications
      • All Publications
    • Defence & Security
      • Behavioural Influencing in the Military Domain
      • (Nuclear) Deterrence and Arms Control
      • Hybrid Threats
      • Rethinking Fire and Manoeuvre
      • Robotic and Autonomous Systems
      • Strategic Monitor Dutch Police
      • Transnational Organised Crime
    • Geopolitics & Geo-economics
      • China in a Changing World Order
      • Europe in a Changing World Order
      • Europe in the Indo-Pacific
      • Knowledge base on Russia (RuBase)
      • PROGRESS / Strategic Monitor
      • Transatlantic Relations
    • Climate, Energy, Materials & Food
      • Climate and Security
        • International Military Council on Climate and Security (IMCCS)
        • Water, Peace & Security (WPS)
      • Critical Minerals
      • Energy Security
        • Tank Storage in Transition
      • Food Security
    • Strategic Technologies
      • Cyber Policy & Resilience
        • Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace (GCSC)
      • Emerging Technologies
      • Global Commission on Responsible Artificial Intelligence in the Military Domain (GC REAIM)
      • Semiconductors
      • Space
  • Dashboards
    • Dashboards
      • All Dashboards
        • GINA
    • Defence & Security
      • DAMON | Disturbances and Aggression Monitor
      • GINA | Military
      • Nuclear Timeline
    • Geopolitics & Geo-economics
      • Dutch Foreign Relations Index
      • GINA | Diplomatic
      • GINA | Economic
      • GINA | Information
    • Climate, Energy, Materials & Food
      • Agrifood Monitor
      • CRM Dashboard
    • Strategic Technologies
      • Cyber Arms Watch
      • Cyber Comparator
      • Cyber Norms Observatory
      • Cyber Transparency
  • Services
    • HCSS Boardroom
    • HCSS Datalab
    • HCSS Socio-Political Instability Survey
    • Strategic Capability Gaming
    • Studio HCSS
    • Indo-Dutch Cyber Security School 2024
    • Southern Africa-Netherlands Cyber Security School 2025
  • NATO Summit
  • GC REAIM
    • GC REAIM | Members
    • GC REAIM | Conferences
    • GC REAIM | Partners, Sponsors, Supporters
  • About HCSS
    • Contact Us
    • Our People
    • Funding & Transparency
    • Partners & Clients
    • HCSS Newsletter
    • HCSS Internship Programme
    • Press & Media Inquiries
    • Working at HCSS
    • Global Futures Foundation
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

News

Sino-European Cyber Dialogue (6SECD )

December 8, 2016

The sixth meeting of the Sino-European Cyber Dialogue (SECD) was convened on 14 and 15 November 2016 in Hangzhou, China. The meeting was hosted by the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR) and The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies (HCSS).  

SECD is supported by the Chinese government, a number of European governments as well as the European External Action Service. Overall, 36 participants and a number of observers attended the meeting. Nine European countries were represented, as well as one EU institution, with particular emphasis on foreign ministry cyber policy coordinators and civil society experts.  

In the Hangzhou meeting, both delegations concentrated on issues relevant to international cybersecurity that are covered by the previous UN Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) on Developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security, including international law, norms of responsible State behavior, confidence building measures (CBMs), and Internet governance and related capacity building. In the sixth iteration, there was engaged discussion on the precise application of international law, the implementation and universalization of norms of responsible State behavior, and confidence building measures. The delegations discussed recent cyber operations and their effects on national security, and agreed that significant interventions in the internal affairs of another State is unacceptable. The effects of conventional arms control paradigms on alleviating risks in cyberspace were also explored. Moreover, both parties addressed the importance of critical infrastructure protection and national risk management, as well as the application of both under new legislation.

On Internet governance-related issues, the IANA transition and the ICANN reforms were welcomed as a positive development towards a more globalized ICANN that is accountable to all stakeholders. Both sides agreed that it marks the start of a new era in Internet governance, which still holds challenges for both ICANN and the broader community.

The delegates stressed the importance of a reliable functioning of cyberspace, and recognized the value that open dialogues and other practical CBMs have on enhancing mutual understanding, cooperation and de-escalation, and in ensuring the overall stability of cyberspace.

Looking forward, delegates agreed on the merit of exploring more concrete discussions on how to best apply international law to cyberspace.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

Experts

Alexander Klimburg

Related News

Related Content

4th Sino-European Cyber Dialogue in Beijing
Ninth Sino-European Cyber Dialogue
3rd Sino-European Cyber Dialogue

Office Address

  • The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies
  • Lange Voorhout 1
  • 2514 EA The Hague
  • The Netherlands

Contact Us

  • Telephone: +31(70) 318 48 40
  • E-mail: info@hcss.nl
  • IBAN NL10INGB0666328730
  • BIC INGBNL2A
  • VAT NL.8101.32.436.B01
  • Contact

Legal & Privacy

  • Disclaimer & Privacy
  • Algemene Voorwaarden (NL) 
  • Terms & Conditions (ENG) 
  • Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure
  • Ethical Standards
  • Manual for Responsible Use of AI

Follow us

© The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies
    Link to: De Nieuwe Revolutionaire Golf Link to: De Nieuwe Revolutionaire Golf De Nieuwe Revolutionaire Golf Link to: What does Brexit mean for European Defense? Link to: What does Brexit mean for European Defense? What does Brexit mean for European Defense?
    Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

    GDPR Consent

    Your privacy is important to us. Here you can set which consent you are allowing us with regards to the collection of general information, the placing of cookies of the collection of personal information. You can click 'Forget my settings' at the bottom of this form to revoke all given consents.

    Privacy policy | Close
    Settings

    GDPR Consent Settings

    Your privacy is important to us. Here you can set which consent you are allowing us with regards to the collection of general information, the placing of cookies of the collection of personal information. You can click 'Forget my settings' at the bottom of this form to revoke all given consents.

    Website statistics collect anonymized information about how the site is used. This information is used to optimize the website and to ensure an optimal user experience.

    View details

    Functional cookies are used to ensure the website works properly and are neccessary to make the site function. These cookies do not collect any personal data.  

    View details
    Forget my settings Deleted!